Abstracts – Browse Results

Search or browse again.

Click on the titles below to expand the information about each abstract.
Viewing 23 results ...

Abd Elsalam, M F (2021) Breaking through the classical determinants in the field of hyper urban planning. Construction Innovation, 21(4), 818-36.

Al Jassmi, H, Al Ahmad, M and Ahmed, S (2021) Automatic recognition of labor activity: a machine learning approach to capture activity physiological patterns using wearable sensors. Construction Innovation, 21(4), 555-75.

Alkhateeb, A M, Hyari, K H and Hiyassat, M A (2021) Analyzing bidding competitiveness and success rate of contractors competing for public construction projects. Construction Innovation, 21(4), 576-91.

Arai, K and Morimoto, E (2021) Productivity and innovation in the Japanese construction industry. Construction Innovation, 21(4), 917-33.

Bilge, E C and Yaman, H (2021) Information management roles in real estate development lifecycle: literature review on BIM and IPD framework. Construction Innovation, 21(4), 723-42.

Bosch-Sijtsema, P, Claeson-Jonsson, C, Johansson, M and Roupe, M (2021) The hype factor of digital technologies in AEC. Construction Innovation, 21(4), 899-916.

Charlson, J and Dimka, N (2021) Design, manufacture and construct procurement model for volumetric offsite manufacturing in the UK housing sector. Construction Innovation, 21(4), 800-17.

Dharmapalan, V, O'Brien, W J, Morrice, D and Jung, M (2021) Assessment of visibility in industrial construction projects: a viewpoint from supply chain stakeholders. Construction Innovation, 21(4), 782-99.

  • Type: Journal Article
  • Keywords: information sharing; materials management; supply chain management; supply chain visibility
  • ISBN/ISSN:
  • URL: https://doi.org/10.1108/CI-07-2020-0114
  • Abstract:
    Stakeholders of construction projects exhibit different perceptions regarding the visibility of materials in the supply chain, which affects the timely delivery and installation of materials. This study aims to quantitatively investigate the differences in viewpoints of owners, contractors, designers and suppliers about the visibility of materials at supply chain locations and different material types during the construction of industrial projects. Survey data about visibility at nine typical supply chain locations and three common material types were collected from owner, contractor, designer and supplier groups and analyzed using frequency statistics, relative importance index and tests for equality of odds. Offsite Tier-2 supplier, ports and kitting site shows the lowest visibility level for the owner, contractor, supplier and designer groups. Also, the supplier group tends to have adequate to extreme visibility at the Tier-2 supplier, kitting site and during transportation compared to owner, contractor and designer groups. An example finding concerning the visibility of material types is that owners and contractors perceive prefabricated material requires higher visibility than all other material types. The findings are limited to construction projects in the industrial sector. Further, the survey participants were based in North America at the time of participation. Practical implications: The study's findings indicate how visibility is spread across supply chain locations and for material types for the owners, contractors, suppliers and designers of industrial projects. As such, academia and industry's research and investment efforts can be more focused on locations and material types that need improvement. Social implications: Industrial projects play an essential part in improving society's daily lives, and this study's findings contribute to improving the efficiency of the supply chain during construction of industrial projects. Although previous studies mentioned the need and importance of visibility improvement, none have sought to understand the perception of leading supply chain stakeholders about visibility at supply chain locations and of material types. This study's findings provide specific insights and directions for advancing in these areas with regard to supply chain visibility.

Ghansah, F A, Owusu-Manu, D G, Ayarkwa, J, Edwards, D J and Hosseini, M R (2021) Exploration of latent barriers inhibiting project management processes in adopting smart building technologies (SBTs) in the developing countries. Construction Innovation, 21(4), 685-707.

Gharouni Jafari, K, Noorzai, E and Hosseini, M R (2021) Assessing the capabilities of computing features in addressing the most common issues in the AEC industry. Construction Innovation, 21(4), 875-98.

Guven, G and Ergen, E (2021) Tracking major resources for automated progress monitoring of construction activities: masonry work case. Construction Innovation, 21(4), 648-67.

Kapogiannis, G, Fernando, T and Alkhard, A M (2021) Impact of proactive behaviour antecedents on construction project managers' performance. Construction Innovation, 21(4), 708-22.

Kasbar, M, Staub-French, S, Pilon, A, Poirier, E, Teshnizi, Z and Froese, T (2021) Construction productivity assessment on Brock Commons Tallwood House. Construction Innovation, 21(4), 951-68.

Lavikka, R, Chauhan, K, Peltokorpi, A and Seppänen, O (2021) Value creation and capture in systemic innovation implementation: case of mechanical, electrical and plumbing prefabrication in the Finnish construction sector. Construction Innovation, 21(4), 837-56.

M.E. Sepasgozar, S, Shirowzhan, S and Loosemore, M (2021) Information asymmetries between vendors and customers in the advanced construction technology diffusion process. Construction Innovation, 21(4), 857-74.

Obi, L I, Arif, M, Awuzie, B, Islam, R, Gupta, A D and Walton, R (2021) Critical success factors for cost management in public-housing projects. Construction Innovation, 21(4), 625-47.

Ofori-Kuragu, J K and Osei-Kyei, R (2021) Mainstreaming pre-manufactured offsite processes in construction – are we nearly there?. Construction Innovation, 21(4), 743-60.

Pablo, Z, London, K, Wong, P S P and Khalfan, M (2021) Actor-network theory and the evolution of complex adaptive supply networks. Construction Innovation, 21(4), 668-84.

Salama, T, Salah, A and Moselhi, O (2021) Integrating critical chain project management with last planner system for linear scheduling of modular construction. Construction Innovation, 21(4), 525-54.

Sarvari, H, Nassereddine, H, Chan, D W M, Amirkhani, M and Md Noor, N (2021) Determining and assessing the significant barriers of transferring unfinished construction projects from the public sector to the private sector in Iran. Construction Innovation, 21(4), 592-607.

Sergeeva, N and Duryan, M (2021) Reflecting on knowledge management as an enabler of innovation in project-based construction firms. Construction Innovation, 21(4), 934-50.

Sutrisna, M, Tjia, D and Wu, P (2021) Developing a predictive model of construction industry-university research collaboration. Construction Innovation, 21(4), 761-81.

Ying, F J, O'Sullivan, M and Adan, I (2021) Simulation of vehicle movements for planning construction logistics centres. Construction Innovation, 21(4), 608-24.